Mannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comMannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agohttps://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/ As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon. What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met.
minus-squareArmok_the_bunny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agoThe problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agoWho released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agoFine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
minus-squarePlasticExistence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agoIt’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.
https://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/
As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon.
What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met.
The problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
Who released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror
Blocked
Fine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
It’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.