Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Lol yeah I bet it is $140 for a handful of things at Kroger and $45 at the pump plus $2,000 rent who’s having kids!!!

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Just makes us easier to subjugate.

    Teen moms are way more likely to drop out of school, which kind of snowballs into lower paying jobs, more financial stress, higher poverty rates, that whole thing. There are also real health risks involved, especially if she’s younger, stuff like preeclampsia and anemia are more common, and sadly maternal mortality is higher too. A lot of teen moms also end up pregnant again within a couple years, and depression and anxiety are pretty common outcomes as well.

    For the kid, preterm birth and low birth weight are more likely, and as they grow up there tend to be more developmental and behavioral challenges on average. One of the more striking stats is that daughters of teen moms are significantly more likely to become teen moms themselves, and that cycle is really hard to break.

    Dads kind of get left out of the research, but the data that exists shows they face a lot of the same economic and educational setbacks, and they’re less likely to stay involved with the child long term.

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Nowhere in the US can 15 year olds legally consent to sex. The age of consent is 16, 17, or 18 depending on the state. This moron is literally supporting child rape.

  • MightyPez@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I remember when teenage pregnancy was the issue of the day and how we had too many young sluts just giving it away.

    I guess the zeitgeist shifts when we’re a nation governed by pedos

  • TheGoldenV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Kinda puts the abstinence only sex ed in a different light. I guess we were just supposed to push out babies and live in trailers the whole time.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Well yes, actually. There’s data from the 1400s that abstinence isn’t sex education and results in higher teen pregnancy rates.

      If the goal was ever to stop teen pregnancy they’d just encourage porn use among teens and free condoms in any third space they congregate.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

    Wait, they want 15 year-old having kids?!!

    Oh wait, it’s Faux News. Yeah, gotta keep them young’uns overwhelmed with babies so they don’t have time to do horrible things like express their concerns, or educate themselves, or aspire to their own dreams. Makes perfect sense.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      If you watch the video, it’s much less strange in context (in fact, it’s not strange at all, although the guy himself is a religious crackpot). The reason he mentions “15 to 19” at all is because that’s the specific demographic in the statistic they have and were talking about. He used that among other things to suggest that people are having kids much later than they used to, but he doesn’t specifically talk about declining teen pregnancy like it’s a bad thing. Like seriously, watch the video; I don’t know what the fuck Mediaite is doing with this headline except for ragebait. I genuinely thought there would be even a little hint of weirdness, but no?? Somebody else please watch the clip and tell me what they think is wrong with it re: teen pregnancies.

      The clip is 2:08 long; I encourage anyone who thinks this is bullshit apologia to watch it. I’m legitimately shocked that I’m having to defend something someone said on Fox News. The whole time watching it I was wondering when they were going to get to the shocking, deranged part.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          maybe people who had living wages would be able to afford more kids… but something tells me they won’t address that. they’ll simply take away birth control and abortion.

          fucking ghouls

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yeah, I really think it is. It’s more evident if you watch the whole video (and I really think you should). I think he was implicating 15 to 19 rates as partial evidence that ages of pregnant women are climbing – but not problematic unto itself. Later in the video, he makes the claim that people are gravitating to waiting until they’re into their 30s to have kids. I.e. the “problem” isn’t specifically that teens are getting pregnant less; a drop in teen pregnancies is just used as a symptom of the reasons people are waiting until late 20s, 30s, or never to have kids.

          Points that he makes throughout the segment are things like advances in medical technology making late pregnancies much more viable, and that certainly isn’t targeted at teen pregnancies.

          Keep in mind that I have zero respect for this guy and would have no reason to doubt he would support teen pregnancies as “god’s will” or whatever the shit: the cover of his book shown in the segment tells it all. Even through that lens, I just don’t see it as anything more than a poor choice of words that can be easily quoted without the full surrounding context. I don’t blame anyone who comes away from this thinking I’m wrong; he’s earned not having a slip-up taken charitably.

          • Stormy@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            I appreciate everything you’ve done so far here- I mean no offense in saying this, but is there any chance you’d accept that maybe, you’re viewing it through a green lens?

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              I really tried not to. I even paused the segment when it showed his book to find out it was talking about “healing through God” – which to me grossly crosses a line for what a medical doctor should be doing. I didn’t go into the video thinking “this is bullshit”; I went into it because that’s standard practice I have for reading “person says X”-type articles like this. That’s why I was in such disbelief.

              I don’t even like his rhetoric about how waiting for stability is some problem in need of solving because young people need to sacrifice their lives for the greater good muh birthrate.

              In sum, I think this guy’s a shithead. What I don’t think is that this guy is advocating for 15-year-olds getting pregnant like the headline and the ever-convenient typo in the quote suggest.

  • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I think not having kids is the only realistic way to fight those capitalistic overlords. They can’t continue to get richer if the workforce, who does all the dirty work for them, keeps shrinking.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      The issue, though, is that when only Conservatives have kids, the next generation grows up even more Conservative.

  • leriotdelac@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’m going nuts. I’m from Russia, and Russian officials say insane stuff, and then I read news from the US, and it’s the same shit, side view.

    Why? Its insane, and it only gets worse. When I lived in the US during Tramp’s first term, it wasn’t that crazy, despite having± same names in high places. Now, it’s like another country, and too much alike my insane motherland. USA, you’re becoming what you hate the most!

    Looneytunes, all of them. ☠️

    • Jiral@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Trump was not daring to go as far as now but most importantly he only learned what the safeguards of rule of law and state institutions are. So even if he tried, there were too many people in too many positions pushing back hard enough for him to hit a wall. So for his second term he used the Republican party to purge all those upright and reasonable people from all those administrative positions. As far as he could anyway. After regaining power, that purge of course vastly accelerated using presidential powers. Also the Supreme Court has a solid Republican majority now, with judges that will go very far in rubber stamping previously considered unconstitutional stuff (maybe not everything but almost as much).

      This will also not go away when Trump is finally going to hell. The destroyed structures are destroyed and the tech oligarchy teamed up with the thecoratic extremists behind him will take over control directly, via Vance or some other guy. It is a lot of the Russian playbook, translated for US cinema.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      USA, you’re becoming what you hate the most!

      For ~40% of Americans, this isn’t true. They hate Democrats more.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    More teens became smart and self aware enough to not get pregnant in so young age by effectively using different types of contraception. And guy says that this is a bad thing. What? 🫪

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is the same group that decries teen mothers who are Black as burdens on the system and trying to cheat welfare by having more babies because more babies means a bigger welfare check that they can spend on lobster, fur coats, and Cadillacs.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    He’s advocating for girls under 18 to have children? 18 is the age of majority. If he’s advocating for sexual contact with children, he needs to be put on a list.

      • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Most places in the united states have ‘romeo and juliet’ style laws, where two people who are within a certain age range (usually 1-4 years) aren’t (necessarily) breaking the law, even if one is underage.

      • DillDough@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        It can be. Even just taking a nude photo of your own body as a minor is a crime in the US.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Depends on the state, but I think mostly yes.

        Like many laws, statutory rape is often inconsistently applied. The most likely scenario is that someone with societal power uses it as a lever to impose their will. Cops rarely, if ever, go looking for someone to protect through enforcement of the law.