I saw a post get banned. Well I dont wanna be a taboo subject. The more we shut down conversations the more we are ostracized. We shouldnt be so dogmatic. A society where people are free to express unpopular opinions is the one we want to live in. Seriously folks.


There are two things you appear ignorant about.
First, while gender and sex are not the same thing HRT can be absurdly effective and adjusting the latter to match the former. There are humans out here who look and act “obviously” manly or womanly, despite privately being female or male respectivly. And that’s before we consider surgical options.
Second, human sex is not that simple. Take the IoC’s “trans women” ban, where they are now testing for the SRY gene. Except that there are cis-women who are XX with a copied SRY from their fatber’s Y, and XY humans for whom the SRY gene is dormant, or whose testes never developed, or who are testosterone resistant – and have appeared feminine since birth. Its entirely likely the IoC will wind up banning more cis women than trans women.
Taken together, these facts lead most people to conclude that the only fair thing is to take people at their word. Sure, doing so means you may need to treat some apparent “bearded women” and “men in dresses” contrary to your initial perception. But most adults do that anyway for literally every other aspect of humanity, and unless you’re a sexist jerk the sum total of what you’d need to change is just pronouns and salutations.
Sex is actually that simple. It’s entirely defined by gamete production. Any edge case you can think of can be resolved to one of two sexes. Note the sexes listed for each DSD here:
https://theparadoxinstitute.org/articles/sex-development-charts
You’re right that sex testing is not as simple
If you reduce sex to ONLY gamete production you esssntjally declare castrated males, menopausal females, children, and anyone with complete infertiktiy to be sexless.
Which has the benefit of keeping categorical simplicity, but most people who argue against nuance in the sexing of humans are against either either the two sexes being “yes/no” questions or the human sexs being three categories of “male”, “female”, and “other”.
(And it still obscures the nuance and variation in human gender and sexuality. Nobody’s sexually attracted to gametes.)
It’s the other way around. Categorical simplicity is observed in nature. Gametic sex is the only coherent definition.
Everyone has a sex. Some people don’t produce gametes. Their bodies still contain sexed structures.
Stomping your feet and pretending the exceptions dont exist doesn’t make them not exist.
Nothing in nature is ever absolutely so.
What exceptions exist?
I already listed a bunch. Here are the relevant comments.
https://lemmy.world/comment/23168319
https://lemmy.world/comment/23272499
I’m sure you can find some other examples if you do apply a proper skeptical review of your idea and search out arguments that disagree with you or examples that break your categorization.
I suggest starting with the relevant Wikipedia articles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation_in_humans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans
Those aren’t exceptions. Castrated males, menopausal females, children, and anyone with complete infertility all have a clear sex.
Please read this link, as previously suggested
https://theparadoxinstitute.org/articles/sex-development-charts
Some more reading
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorders_of_sex_development
Those are variations within the sex binary. Not an exception. You’re confusing sex with phenotype and genotype.
Please apply a proper skeptical review of your idea. I’ve saved you the effort of searching. Here is more:
https://www.gwup.org/skeptiker-artikel/sonstiges/one-reality-two-sexes-and-many-endless-debates/
Dude, you are the one arguing the position that sex is merely gamete production.
My position is merely “it’s complicated and we need to leave space for edge cases.” (I am perfectly fine with male/female being separate yes/no questions or having the sex options be m/f/x)
Linking to a transphobic advocacy site just identifies you as either an embarassed transphobe or a sucker.