Soatok Dreamseeker@pawb.socialM to Furry Technologists@pawb.social · 27 days agoThe Long Tail of Work Left Until ActivityPub Has E2EEsoatok.blogexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe Long Tail of Work Left Until ActivityPub Has E2EEsoatok.blogSoatok Dreamseeker@pawb.socialM to Furry Technologists@pawb.social · 27 days agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareforestbeasts@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoI uh, really hope it STAYS private posts that only both users can see, just with encryption on top. Way too many people think it should be some kind of weird bolted-on IM system and like… ugh NO!! the current way it works is better than that! – Frost
minus-squareSoatok Dreamseeker@pawb.socialOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoI am not envisioning an IM system. I’m envisioning a correctly implemented encryption layer for how DMs currently work (with the caveat that I believe cryptography should never EVER be done in the browser (unless an extension or whatever)).
minus-squareTԋҽNσƙMαƈԋιɳҽ@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoI wonder, why shouldn’t it be done in browser ?
minus-squareSoatok Dreamseeker@pawb.socialOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoRead the thing I linked
I uh, really hope it STAYS private posts that only both users can see, just with encryption on top.
Way too many people think it should be some kind of weird bolted-on IM system and like… ugh NO!! the current way it works is better than that!
– Frost
I am not envisioning an IM system.
I’m envisioning a correctly implemented encryption layer for how DMs currently work (with the caveat that I believe cryptography should never EVER be done in the browser (unless an extension or whatever)).
I wonder, why shouldn’t it be done in browser ?
Read the thing I linked