• TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    IQ is just one factor of intelligence, and not even the most important one. And even so, 94 is only just below average, it’s not so bad.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      it’s neither bad nor good, it’s just a relative score. If everyone except you was einstein then your IQ would be 1, but that doesn’t magically make you dumber than you are now.

      Basically everyone is constantly getting smarter (due to stuff like education and better access to food), so you can’t even compare IQ scores over time

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah, and if you’re below 85 you automatically qualify for a job in the current government of the United States. Vice president or something…

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Can we please do this without the ableism? The US government is bad because the people are evil, not because they are stupid. Even if ostensibly they are both.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Good point. Thanks. I’m gonna self-delete this and take it as an invitiation to think about ableism.

          • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            You can say that, but it doesn’t make it true. I don’t think most of them are evil, and given their position they’re probably above average intelligence as well.

            True evil is when causing harm (or suffering) is not merely a means to an end, but the end itself - the person derives pleasure or satisfaction from the act of harming others, independent of any larger goal. They don’t rationalize it as “necessary” or “for the greater good.” The suffering is the point.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          It’s not an exact science for starters so a +/- 5 points seems a likely margin, but I guess its just inside one “deviation”. 125 would be at +1 and so on (just making example numbers here).

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Which is fucking pointless to point out because 80% falls into that 15 point deviation.

        If you want true average, a 5-6 point deviation is more useful. Especially given the vast difference between someone with an IQ of 86 and the IQ of 114 - former will be failing most of their classes whereas latter will be excelling in most (not accounting for other personality traits that affect scholarly results, of course).

        • Pholous@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          No, ~68,3% fall into that deviation.

          Given that tests only approximate the real value and that there are errors and biases, being too exact wouldn’t serve you any function.

          But I think you are right that a deviation of 30 from under to upper limit of average IQ is pretty big.