Friday’s appeals court ruling in the New Jersey case goes further than a July 2024 ruling from a federal judge, who said that the state’s ban on AR-15s specifically was unconstitutional but upheld the provision barring larger magazines.

The third US circuit court of appeals said on Friday in its opinion that the state’s ban on all semiautomatic rifles it deems to be “assault firearms” and its restriction on “large capacity ammunition magazines” were unconstitutional.

New Jersey’s attorney general, Jennifer Davenport, a Democrat whose office defended the law, told the Associated Press that the decision is “as unfortunate as it is legally incorrect”.

“Gotta maximize the body count of school children”

-These judges, probably

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, absolutely.

      For example, I care more about the thirteenth amendment (the slavery one)than the 27th (the one about Congress getting pay raises)

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The right of the state to keep slaves as punishment? That’s a weird thing to care about.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        You don’t need to sacrifice either. All rights are to be protected.

        Importantly, by working to kill one you undermine the foundation they all stand on. For why can’t one right be ignored if you fight to ignore others?