I’m probably older than many here and have used messaging systems since UNIX “talk” and “write”. Commercial IMs such as icq, msn, yahoo, google chat, WhatsApp, signal. Federated and open systems such as irc and Jabber.
I have tried to jump into Matrix, but it is terrible. The resource usage is crazy, the user experience (even for an expert like myself) is incredibly bad, I lose messages, federation breaks all the time, and it doesn’t even bring anything new to the table regarding features! I cannot recommend it to anybody, not even my nerd friends!
Curious, I dived down into its specifications, and it is clear that the people who designed it didn’t learn anything from past systems. They just wanted to create a new and shiny messenger: “theirs” — cue in XKCD 927
I understand the push for a “modern” messaging system (xmpp is from the late 90s, during the hype of xml, etc) but Matrix, while “modern” in the sense of recent, is definitely worse than the previous alternatives. It is plain unusable. I wish I was wrong. I have used it for 3 years waiting for improvements but it is simply broken by design.
Wrong community. That view is the majority view for everyone but the most die hard stans of Matrix.
And from a technical perspective the pseudo blockchain that is the foundation of the protocol is a terrible idea and should have never left the prototyping stage. But while their former bosses at Amdocs agreed and refused to further fund the project, the Matrix people got lots of crypto-currency funding during the height of that bubble to continue forward with this horrible idea.
Edit: the protocol might have some usecase as an email replacement in highly regulated government setting though.
Can you please elaborate on that? 🤔
The data model that the distributed database that forms the core of the Matrix protocol is using has many technical similarities to blockchains, just without the proof-of-work that Bitcoin etc added on top of the Merkle-tree.