ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 months agoUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square215linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 months agomessage-square215linkfedilink
minus-squaresirdorius@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIsn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoBut if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
minus-squareTheKingBee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoBut so what if it is, if it’s stupid but it works it’s not stupid.
minus-squareDisasterTransport@startrek.websitedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIf it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoAnd, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼 Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.
minus-squarebjaress@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoSo, “red, green, refactor” has become “red, green, deploy”? That’s a change, for sure, but I wouldn’t call it an evolution.
Isn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
But if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
But so what if it is, if it’s stupid but it works it’s not stupid.
If it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
And, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼
Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.
So, “red, green, refactor” has become “red, green, deploy”?
That’s a change, for sure, but I wouldn’t call it an evolution.