Russia claims to be fighting for its survival in Ukraine. But look closer at the casualties. The dead are overwhelmingly from ethnic minorities: Kazakhs, Buryats, Altai, Tuvans. Not ethnic Russians.
This is not an accident. This is design.
How Russia does it:
-
Engineered poverty. In the Altai Republic, 85% of the population lives below the poverty line. Life expectancy has dropped to 44 years. These regions are rich in resources, but the wealth flows to Moscow, not to the people who live there. Minorities are left with nothing.
-
No education, no future. Schools in minority regions are underfunded and substandard. Young men grow up with no skills, no prospects, no way out. The army becomes the only escape from a life of poverty.
-
Economic coercion. Military service offers a salary that a young man could never earn in his village. It offers status, respect, and a way to support his family. For many, it’s the only option.
-
Divide and rule. Russia has deliberately fractured ethnic groups – splitting the Altai into multiple smaller groups to weaken their political power. They pit minorities against each other to prevent unity. This is a strategy straight from the colonial playbook.
The result:
- Minorities are sent to the front lines with outdated equipment, little training, and zero motivation. They are treated as expendable.
- Ethnic Russians are kept in safer rear positions. They are the “protected” class.
- When minorities die, Moscow barely mourns. Their names are just numbers in a telegram channel.
The deeper truth:
This is not just about war. This is a system of internal colonialism that has existed since Soviet times. Russia uses minorities as cannon fodder in its wars while draining their lands of resources and denying them basic opportunities. They are not allies – they are slaves to an imperial regime that sees them as disposable.
This is the real face of Russia. Not the propaganda of “brotherhood of peoples,” but a cynical empire that uses poverty and desperation to recruit the poor and marginalized to die for the ambitions of the powerful.


Calling it a parasitic behavior is more suitable, as for me.
“parasitic behavior” is a soft word