• HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I guess calling it “social awareness” threw me off because to me that’s something completely different from what I’m saying.

    It’s just basic economics (of countries whose economies are not based on resource extraction, which you can technically effectively do with a miserable and unhealthy populace).

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, I just checked the definition of “social awareness” and I might have misused the expression, though I don’t quite know what would be the correct one to use to mean the awareness of how at multiple levels the lives of people around us can impact our own lives.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        To me “social awareness” relates to how your actions impact the feelings of others, not so much the brutal math of the situation (which I would call Economics, which luckily happens to align with the empathetic angle in most countries).

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The problem a lot of times is that the social impact doesn’t get time to be addressed before it gets stopped in peoples minds. Many people get to “healthcare is expensive, I can’t/don’t want to pay someone else’s healthcare. Forget the economy or social benefit, I can’t afford to pay it.” So the benefits are there, but when people are struggling it’s hard to ask them to see beyond their nose.