• MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I think the argument is that artists will create art even with limited tools regardless.

    I’m an artist that works on computers all day doing things like Photoshop touch-ups. But to use those tools, I started out by scribbling on anything and everything with whatever I had available all my life. Doing so let me understand the the finer details as well as how to achieve certain looks. I carried those skills into my digital work.

    If I don’t have a computer, I still create art even if I have not used the medium before. I might not pick up a paintbrush and become Caravaggio, but what I will do is draw on my experience to make something a tad better than someone who has never made anything themselves.

    This person probably never drew on a rock with charred sticks. But they probably used a pencil on paper and those skills are similar.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      But then everyone is an artist, like what makes yoy an artist and not me an artist? Oh you pay your rent by creating art? Then you’re a “professional” artist.

      • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        What makes an artist an artist is a question that will be debated for a long time.

        But someone jamming a prompt into a LLM does not make them an artist.