How many times are you gonna ask basically the same question?
You could try out a DSA book club. They sometimes read through fiction books that are much more entertaining than straight up economic theory (…for some) then everyone discusses. It’s a very approachable way to start understanding marxist/leftist socioeconomic ideas. Link: Reading Groups
What if I prefer to study from the comfort of my bedroom? Just asking.
Most of them are virtual groups - no need to leave the bed!
Don’t.
Read Kayanerenko:wa The Great Law of Peace. It’s political theory from the Indigenous people that gave Engels the idea for communism.
Get your communism straight from the source, don’t settle for the cheap European knockoff.
No, I meant this: https://www.booktopia.com.au/kayanerenk-wa-kayanesenh-paul-williams/book/9780887558214.html
That one looks like a very direct legal explanation of the law, which will be less useful to non-Haudenosaunee, because it doesn’t explain everything to a novice level. Kayanesenh spends a long time explaining the fundamentals to the reader, and goes on a lot of tangents about some very important philosophy.
I get a “403 forbidden” error for that link. But thanks for steering me away from something I definitely wouldn’t have been able to finish.
I don’t like Amazon but I’ll have to resort to their site https://www.amazon.com.au/Kayanerenkó-WA-Great-Law-Peace/dp/0887558216
Thank! Using that I was able to find a local seller who ships internationally https://www.kennys.ie/shop/kayanerenko-wa-the-great-law-of-peace-williams-kayanesenh-9780887558214
Which indigenous people?
Which indigenous people?
The Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse) on Turtle Island (North America), commonly known as the Iroquois.
I thought the 1848 manuscripts were pretty rocking when I first read them.
I always felt Marx’s finished products had a kind of dull exposition, at least for large parts. I think he felt he had to lay out a system like that. But the unfinished stuff, even the Grundrisse have a lively dialectical feel that is pretty captivating.
Do you mean 1844? I couldn’t find 1848
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_and_Philosophic_Manuscripts_of_1844
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm
I’ve always understood Marx as a historian who used the perspective of resources as the lens to view history. I don’t think he was going out of his way to figure out how to get the working class to rise up.
I’ve been always a bit partial towards Herbert Marcuse, someone who I regard as part of the Marxist thought. I think his book One-Dimensional Man was a interesting read as an explanation to our modern technologically advanced society.
Nope
Also just get into anarchism instead. Anarchists are always sexy.
Idk. I’ve always experienced that people who claim to be anarchists are just libertarians in hiding.
Anarchosyndicalism, not anarchocapitalism (it’s funny the the autocorrect changes this to avariciousness). The former is left wing. The other is Ayn Rand.
I don’t know what to do about that
Ive met tons of anarchists who had a firm grasp of anti-capitalism
It’s easy to get that impression on Lemmy, but if you come to https://soulism.net/ you can read a manifesto from anarchists so far left that some anarchists refuse to believe in us.
Stupid sexy anarchist.
I mean you can look for cartoon guide to marx or something like that. Maybe youtube has some videos about it that are not so dry?
Things seeming boring and dry is your mind telling you that you’re trying to learn something that isn’t interesting to you. Fancy tricks to hide that core truth won’t undo it.
Why do you think you want to learn Marxist theory? To have status among leftists? Go punch a Nazi. To understand modern or historical leftists? Their actions aren’t guided by Marxist theory. To have status among political theorists, economists, and liberals? Lol. Lmao even.
To gleam a better way to have a succesful revolution that results in a better society? Okay, cool, do you have a community of people that won’t starve to death within days of trade being cut off? If no, congratulations, now you know all Marxist theory that you need to know until you do have such a community.
While I do strongly oppose fascism in all forms, call me a liberal hippie (Hi, liberal hippie!), but I prefer not to fight, and violence is NOT a good tactic. However if I do know martial arts, and some fascist hooligan comes at me, I would probably kick their ass in self-defense.
I’m looking to study socialist theory because I’m getting very sick and tired of capitalism going unchecked, as well as the conditions of the very archaic bourgeois-capitalist system that enable people to push others around because of who they are.
Do you have a community of people that won’t starve to death within days of trade being cut off?
I assume you’re talking about the famines that happened in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin - there are factors into why that happened such as the bureaucratization of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and lack of the agricultural tools needed for farming. If the US were a socialist country and they’d bring them a bunch of tractors and such (like in the alternate history story “Reds! A Revolutionary Timeline”), the famines wouldn’t happen. NOT being rude, NOT being insensitive, just saying.
Oh and I prefer regular Marxism and left-communism. Seriously!
There is value in learning things that at first glance seem boring or dry.
Why do you think you want to learn Marxist theory? To have status among leftists? Go punch a Nazi. To understand modern or historical leftists? Their actions aren’t guided by Marxist theory. To have status among political theorists, economists, and liberals? Lol. Lmao even.
It’s also possible that OP is studying this stuff simply because they are interested in political philosophy
If they are interested in it, then why is it boring to them? Genuine question.
There is value in learning things that at first glance seem boring or dry.
Is there? If the school system is any indication, people can spend literal years studying things they find boring without retaining them. Plus they can develop a hatred for the subject. Plus all sorts of bad intellectual habits like pretending they know the answer so they’re allowed to move on.
I agree that things that feel boring to someone can turn out to be important to them, but that’s a contextualization issue, not a nose-to-the-grindstone one. As the game design adage goes; you have to show the lock before having them hunt for the key.
There is no reason to study Marx other than you find it interesting or because it relates to something your interested in. There is very little utility in knowing the theory.
Marx was a genius similar to Freud. They changed the way we think and gave us new tools to examine the world. Beyond that, their particular ideals are often as wrong as two left shoes.
There is plenty of room on the left for people who reject, or are ignorant of Marx.
Dam, great reply
I would start with Duck Soup.
Which Marx Brother is your favorite?
I really like Harpo
there’s a chick whose videos get posted on
videos@lemmy.mlhexbear, I don’t remember her name but it should be something super obvious. She seems to know not just the theory but also a lot Russia in the period of time it was written in.Also there’s this guy on youtube called Andrewism. He interprets a lot of theory for adaptation in the future and for building community now where he lives. He’s pretty cool.
edit: links
Very interesting, did not know about either, thanks!
No.
You can… read Marx? Or find a podcast about him?
It’s economics, “boring” or “dry” kinda comes with the package
If you want sexy you can try Che Guevara or Max Stirner (lol good luck)
Do you mean Marxism-Leninism? Thats what most people mean when they say Marxism, but there are lots of us who appreciate Marx and disagree with the trajectory his namesake took.
I don’t mean Marxism-Leninism, I mean regular Marxism
For clarity MLism was reverse engineered by Stalin to justify the violent oppression of the working class, it spread to other regimes that wanted to justify the same, but Lenin didn’t have a lot to do with it.
Correct
There were still problems with Lenin imo but im just an anarchist, we all got killed or gulag’d
I heard Lenin decided to hold an election, didn’t like the results, and decided to switch to a one party state after the election.











