• CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ll explain it slowly, parents need a second wage to pay the bills as a result of this their kid gets put in daycare which they rather didn’t.

      But then that daycare eats up that entire wage, leaving the parents in the same spot financially but now without time or energy.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If you’re trying to say that parents need a second job or supplemental income to pay for daycare you might be correct. Maybe, probably. I don’t know. But that has nothing to do with what I was saying.

        • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          No they need a second wage to pay the bills.

          As a result of that the need for daycare arises, then that daycare gobbled up that ENTIRE wage in my country.

          It does not work. It costs too much. No matter how much you justify the cost from the business point of view.

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t know what country you’re in. I’m in America and that’s what I was basing my comment on. Which is what the original post was commenting on.

            Maybe in your country it’s different and overhead for daycare is Non-Existent… I don’t know.

            In any case your disbelief doesn’t make my statement untrue unless you can bake up your claims with some kind of evidence. Instead of “nuh-uh”.