The U.S. Army has used up much of its stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military’s ​readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. has used “virtually all” of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The ‌degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions are an important part the military’s arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    How much does this reduce security for Americans locally? Like are we more likely to be invaded because of this or is it just the waste of resources we should be mad about?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      These are ground attack missiles. Not used for defense.

      Also not used against aircraft or ships

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody’s going to invade the US from the outside, you can sleep tight. Completely pointless to even try, y’all are protected by geography before the expensive military even comes into consideration.

      Canada and Mexico are the only countries that could invade without being completely bogged down by super long supply lines. Both added together still have a much smaller population than the US. And the US has mountains which can be leveraged to slow down enemy advances.

      Let’s say the US finds itself without any allies whatsoever. It would take Canada + Mexico + multiple large, well-equipped countries with large navies to have any real hope of getting the US to surrender. Canada, Mexico and China at the very least, someone would also have to come from the Atlantic side with a large navy. It would have to be from all 4 sides, not necessarily at once either - get the US to concentrate the forces to either the atlantic or pacific coast, then surprise them from the other side with an even larger force.

      Basically pointless to try, nobody is this stupid. The US is more likely to have an internal coup.

      • rynn@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are probably right, b ur bu really wonder how the drone + ai situation really changes the economics.

        The situations in Iran and Ukraine are very eye opening and I worry the us military is way more focused on big strong boats.