Godric@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 6 days ago"Critical support" Compromise?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square88linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up11arrow-down1image"Critical support" Compromise?lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square88linkfedilinkcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days ago You need peace before you can get a security guarantee, Which they had in 2015 and couldn’t get one and the only way to get peace is through some negotiation. Which they did in 2014 and still got invaded in 2022
minus-squareZMoney@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 days agoYes they get a security guarantee this time, obviously. It’s like arguing with an LLM
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 days agoAnd how do you propose that they guarantee that before negotiations? Or do you propose that they negotiate for peace, let Putin end a second war with a profit, and then hope that things go better than the last time they did the exact same thing?
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 days ago It’s like arguing with an LLM Or perhaps it is because your position is untenable?
Which they had in 2015 and couldn’t get one
Which they did in 2014 and still got invaded in 2022
Yes they get a security guarantee this time, obviously. It’s like arguing with an LLM
And how do you propose that they guarantee that before negotiations? Or do you propose that they negotiate for peace, let Putin end a second war with a profit, and then hope that things go better than the last time they did the exact same thing?
Or perhaps it is because your position is untenable?