Completely unusable for normal human beings. I use it in combination with yt-dlp and for that it’s nice but as a general purpose media player it’s awful. No graphical interface or settings that are usable without a wiki.
Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I’d say is “comparable” with VLC?
https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both.
libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players.
When people say “use mpv”, its like “use Linux”. Generally speaking you aren’t doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly.
No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc.
Now I am curious. Why not?
Completely unusable for normal human beings. I use it in combination with yt-dlp and for that it’s nice but as a general purpose media player it’s awful. No graphical interface or settings that are usable without a wiki.
Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I’d say is “comparable” with VLC? https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both.
Thats good to know. Saved for future reference
That is fair. Use it daily on Linux because its so customizable and powerful, but not a plug n play solution.
libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players.
When people say “use mpv”, its like “use Linux”. Generally speaking you aren’t doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly.
No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc.