By law, we had to make certain redactions.… But we said to Congress, any congressman can come in and spend as much time as they want looking at everything unredacted.
By law, we had to make certain redactions.… But we said to Congress, any congressman can come in and spend as much time as they want looking at everything unredacted.
He is “acting AG”. Not even confirmed yet. The purpose of impeachment is to take an appointee from “confirmed” to “non-confirmed” status. I am not even sure impeachment would make sense? Couldn’t Trump join make him acting AG immediately again?
Then they can skip impeachment and go straight to imprisonment.
No, that’s not correct. “Impeachment is a process by which a legislative body or other legally constituted tribunal initiates charges against a public official for misconduct.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/impeachment
From your own article:
So removal only. Which might even nor make sense, because he was never confirmed by the Senate. Trump can just immediately appoint him again.
“…and disqualification from office.”
What? “Has resulted”. That’s a possible historical result. Impeachment is a process.
He’s the AG. This was a trick they pulled in the first term. You make a guy the “acting” head of the agency, and he does the job until the new guy gets appointed, and approved by the Senate.
So what happens if you name an “acting” head, and then never choose a final appointee? Nothing. Nothing happens. Your chosen guy remains the head of the agency, without ever being vetted or approved by the Senate.
Todd Flintstone is the new AG, for all ill tents and porpoises.
Ah I believe you mean intensive porpoises