Yup, Marxism-Leninism, by introducing generational trauma worldwide via USSR in general and crushing non-bolshevik flavours of communism when they had their best chances of succeeding in their revolutions in the inter-war period.
You tankies are a bunch of totalitarian fucking endgame capitalist twats, all of you.
cry about it, marxism leninism prevailed over any oter idealist flavor of communism because marxism leninism is te most coherent, theoretically complete and practical ideology.
marxism leninism is te most coherent, theoretically complete and practical ideology.
That’s the most sincere love letter to the capitalism I’ve ever seen.
But what am I saying, monopolizing every inch of capital by a single party and suppressing other players (such as syndicalists or luxemburgists) to secure ideological domination in their own field… That bears no sign of capitalism.
your critique of marxism leninism seems to be “party have control over production” which in no way reflects capitalism due to absence of the bourgeosie, wage labor, profit extraction, etc. Your critique seems to be moral rather than materialistic.
You also assume that said parties completely function by the direction of some elite and not by the suggestion of people.
Great, you have the knowledge and you have the awareness, now I’d like to hear your take on Holodomor. Should be easy for you as it perfectly ties both of these takes together.
shut up already
seems like someone hurt you
Yup, Marxism-Leninism, by introducing generational trauma worldwide via USSR in general and crushing non-bolshevik flavours of communism when they had their best chances of succeeding in their revolutions in the inter-war period.
You tankies are a bunch of totalitarian fucking endgame capitalist twats, all of you.
cry about it, marxism leninism prevailed over any oter idealist flavor of communism because marxism leninism is te most coherent, theoretically complete and practical ideology.
CRY
That’s the most sincere love letter to the capitalism I’ve ever seen.
But what am I saying, monopolizing every inch of capital by a single party and suppressing other players (such as syndicalists or luxemburgists) to secure ideological domination in their own field… That bears no sign of capitalism.
your critique of marxism leninism seems to be “party have control over production” which in no way reflects capitalism due to absence of the bourgeosie, wage labor, profit extraction, etc. Your critique seems to be moral rather than materialistic.
You also assume that said parties completely function by the direction of some elite and not by the suggestion of people.
Do you know a single thing about how the USSR actually functioned?
Define bourgeoisie, because what else would the soviet ruling class effectively be if not just that?
I know more about that than you since I am a communist
Bourgeosie owns private poperty for extraction of surplus value for its own which is generated by labor power of working class. Hope this helps
Great, you have the knowledge and you have the awareness, now I’d like to hear your take on Holodomor. Should be easy for you as it perfectly ties both of these takes together.