At the Linux Foundation’s Open Source Summit, the Linux creator argued that AI-written code claims are misleading — and warned that a wave of low-quality, AI-generated bug reports is quietly burning out the maintainers who keep open source running.

[…]

Speaking on stage, Torvalds said the framing misses an obvious historical parallel. Compilers have translated essentially all shipped source code into machine code for decades, he noted, yet no engineer describes their software as “compiler-written.” AI, in his view, belongs in the same category — a powerful productivity layer sitting on top of human design and understanding, not a replacement for it.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    and the link does not contain a quote that can be remotely matched to this post’s title.

    That’s not the case - first part pharaphrases Torvalds, second part cites him.

    • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Torvalds was careful to frame this as a correction of language rather than a rejection of the technology itself.

      You “paraphrased” the very thing Mr. Torvalds was trying to be careful about, contorting it into click bait rather than the nuance that he and the article are trying to get across.