The federal government should consider a one-to-two-point increase in the GST and slower growth in federal transfer payments to the provinces to finance a massive jump in military spending, according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute.
Was listening to the most recent episode of The Dig https://thedigradio.com/podcast/economic-warfare-w-asli-bali-esfandyar-batmanghelidj-nicholas-mulder/ and they made a really astute point that the US’s immense military budget does not exist to produce the most effective weapons (as we can clearly see in their war on Iran), it exists to spend money into private corporations’ pockets. Canada is apparently no different.
The podcast guests also mentioned that Iran’s yearly military budget is only about US$8 billion, yet they’ve been quite successful at waging asymmetric warfare in self-defense against the largest and supposedly most powerful military on the planet. As for Canada: even before all these increases, we were already spending more than 3.5 times that amount, around US$30 billion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest_military_expenditures.
And even now, the Canadian government/military are acting as if we still have to spend three times that amount in order to have any hope whatsoever of fending off attacks. It’s ridiculous. This is robbery.
I think that is precisely the dynamic. The oligarchs basically found a socially acceptable way to funnel taxes back into their pockets instead of productive purposes they’re meant for. It’s a great trick since you can always find ways to scare people into funding the military, and these policies tend to have fairly broad support.
Meanwhile, it’s not even clearly whom our military plans to fight exactly. We’re certainly not going to take on the US, especially given that most of our weapons are produced there. We’re not going to take on Russia either. Our best bet for protection would be to create deeper ties with China which could act as a balance to the US. Also, as we now see in Iran, the kind of military we are building is completely outdated. Modern military would rely on cheap drones and missiles as a primary form of defense.
I’ve heard the argument that we should include infrastructure in our military spending. Stuff like transportation infrastructure (mostly up north), an east/west electric grid, etc. Things that improve resilience and would (probably) improve our chances during an invasion.
Yeah, I agree with taking money allocated for defense and spending it on infrastructure that would improve defense but it’s primarily going to be for civilian benefit, but doing so just makes it even more glaring the we don’t just fund that infrastructure without making it part of a defense budget.
Was listening to the most recent episode of The Dig https://thedigradio.com/podcast/economic-warfare-w-asli-bali-esfandyar-batmanghelidj-nicholas-mulder/ and they made a really astute point that the US’s immense military budget does not exist to produce the most effective weapons (as we can clearly see in their war on Iran), it exists to spend money into private corporations’ pockets. Canada is apparently no different.
The podcast guests also mentioned that Iran’s yearly military budget is only about US$8 billion, yet they’ve been quite successful at waging asymmetric warfare in self-defense against the largest and supposedly most powerful military on the planet. As for Canada: even before all these increases, we were already spending more than 3.5 times that amount, around US$30 billion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest_military_expenditures.
And even now, the Canadian government/military are acting as if we still have to spend three times that amount in order to have any hope whatsoever of fending off attacks. It’s ridiculous. This is robbery.
I think that is precisely the dynamic. The oligarchs basically found a socially acceptable way to funnel taxes back into their pockets instead of productive purposes they’re meant for. It’s a great trick since you can always find ways to scare people into funding the military, and these policies tend to have fairly broad support.
Meanwhile, it’s not even clearly whom our military plans to fight exactly. We’re certainly not going to take on the US, especially given that most of our weapons are produced there. We’re not going to take on Russia either. Our best bet for protection would be to create deeper ties with China which could act as a balance to the US. Also, as we now see in Iran, the kind of military we are building is completely outdated. Modern military would rely on cheap drones and missiles as a primary form of defense.
Frighten people, then sell them the promise of safety.
a time honored tradition
I’ve heard the argument that we should include infrastructure in our military spending. Stuff like transportation infrastructure (mostly up north), an east/west electric grid, etc. Things that improve resilience and would (probably) improve our chances during an invasion.
Yeah, I agree with taking money allocated for defense and spending it on infrastructure that would improve defense but it’s primarily going to be for civilian benefit, but doing so just makes it even more glaring the we don’t just fund that infrastructure without making it part of a defense budget.