• Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My point was you said good idea but not under this government, those are the other two feasible alternatives so I was asking if you would rather they did it, as no one else will be in a position to.

        I do hate the online “its not perfect so I’m going to throw my toys out the pram and complain so something even a little better doesnt happen”.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sneering about the trolley problem doesn’t work when don’t is an option. There is no reason this has to happen, right the hell now. It’s not suddenly any more necessary or feasible than it has been in decades past, and it won’t stop being feasible once all these pricks are seen as archaic. You can and will do better than this. Set things in stone… then.

          • Womble@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Do you think the Attlee, Wilson or Blair governments were perfect, should they have not pushed through reforms because they weren’t?

            Why should this governments less than perfect stance on trans rights stop them pushing for defining the role of local governments more clearly, or moving to a better voting system? Should Blair not have done devolution for Wales and Scotland, or removing most of the hereditary lords because he didn’t push though total gay marriage equality?

            Insisting on waiting for perfection to do anything is a tool of those who don’t want anything to change and benefit from the status quo.