Let’s say, for instance, someone with lung cancer coughs, and a few cancer cells are present in the aerosol, and is breathed in. Or, if someone has a cut, and lives with a family member who has cancer, and cancer cells end up in the cut.
Let’s say, for instance, someone with lung cancer coughs, and a few cancer cells are present in the aerosol, and is breathed in. Or, if someone has a cut, and lives with a family member who has cancer, and cancer cells end up in the cut.
Tell that to the people who developed cancer after being injected with it, then, proving that cancer will develop in a person if those cells end up in their body, just like if you’re injected with a live virus, it will try to take hold.
You brought up coughing or blood transference both of which have shown not to transfer cancer. You would understand this if you actually read the article
You say that like it wouldn’t be considered unethical to prove it by today’s standards. The shower thought is that could it be this is at least part of the reason why cancer rates are increasing.
This kind of disinformation can cause discrimination against those battling cancer and cancer survivors.
The likely cause if increased cancer rate is the increased consumption of ultra processed foods.
https://www.aicr.org/resources/blog/ultra-processed-foods-and-cancer-whats-the-connection/
This clown keeps citing Charles Southam as if he was a respectable scientist whose experiments produced reliable data. I doubt they care about discrimination against cancer patients given that they hold esteem for a man convicted of crimes related to performing experiments on cancer patients without their consent.
Hanlon’s Razor - “Assume ignorance before malice”
shrugs you maybe right