• zloubida@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    You seem to think that God is a micromanager which decide everything. It’s not the Biblical God. This is explained by the myth of creation (yes it’s a myth, but it’s not because it’s not historical that it’s not meaningful). Evil and suffering wasn’t in God’s plan. What was in God’s plan, was freedom for the Creation, which is not possible without an alternative: follow God’s will, or not. The Creation chose to try an other way, and God cried. But he respected the choice.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Evil and suffering wasn’t in God’s plan

      Did God create the universe? Did he know evil and suffering would occur before he created the universe? Could he have created the universe another way?

      If the answer to all 3 is yes, everything must be according to his plan. If the answer to any is no, you have to get rid of either all-knowing or all-powerful.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I say no to the last one. But that doesn’t mean he’s not all-powerful in the proper sense of the word, because he can’t do impossible things.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I guess my next question would be why would it be impossible? I’ll accept that he can’t do logically impossible things, like make a square circle, but the idea that he could have made changes to nature is not logically impossible.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            He can change nature. But not in a way that would preserve freedom and make nature obey all his wishes at the same time. That is the squared circle.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              I’m not talking about obeying his wishes, I’m talking about unnecessary suffering. Could he make a world with free will and no baby cancer?

              • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 days ago

                His wish is for the creation to be free of suffering. If he forced that, there wouldn’t be freedom. And by freedom I’m not speaking abot human agency, but the metaphysical capacity of the cosmos to be something God doesn’t want.

                • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  metaphysical capacity of the cosmos to be something God doesn’t want

                  Either God created that capacity (literally nothing can exist if he does not will it), or there are higher metaphysical concepts than God.

    • amio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      which is not possible without an alternative

      Oh? So he’s not omnipotent then?

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’ll cite myself one message higher:

        If your definition of omnipotence includes the ability to do the impossible, then, as a Christian, I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent, but that is merely a matter of wordplay.

        • amio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          The passive-aggressive “as per my last email” doesn’t magically make that bs make sense. You do understand that, right?

          Omnipotence is defined as “unlimited power”. god can’t do X -> god is not omnipotent. Extremely simple stuff if you’re not an apologist.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Like I said, if it’s your definition, then I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent. It’s not a gotcha when I already said that I agreed with that…