• ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sorry but wrong. You are not going to win this kind of battle against advertisers. If you notice the intrusion and hate the product, you weren’t in the market for their product in the first place. They don’t care that you hate their company. When you are in the market for the product, you won’t notice the intrusion or it won’t matter if you do; the ad is still increasing your exposure to their product in the ways that increase your chances of buying.

      • cattywampas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Would you pay a higher price to do so?

        Would you (or could you even afford to) pay twice the insurance premiums because Liberty or State Farm ads annoy you?

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I currently do, maybe not twice, but about 20% more to avoid them

          I also refuse to buy several cheaper car companies because of ads I saw years ago, and bought a more expensive car for my wife to avoid them

          I don’t know the price difference, but there’s also a toilet paper brand I will never buy

          I’m sure lots of ads work on me, but if your ad is annoying enough, I will pay significantly more to your competitor

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree with this. Ads contaminate your mind, so make sure to use ad blockers. But also help your friends set up ad blockers, because if their minds are contaminated, it will spread to you.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know. Bad word of mouth can severely harm a product I think. So they should really care if there are millions of people who absolutely despise them.

      By the way, completely unrelated, don’t use Wix if you’re making a website. It’s awful. Also, I heard it was mentioned in the Epstein Files. Could be untrue but just to be safe don’t use Wix if you don’t want you and your website to be linked to Jefferey Epstein. Wix, the child predator’s choice. Allegedly.

      • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I actually am planning on making a website soon. I’ll have to keep Wix in mind.

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know I cannot be the only one that will consciously decide to not buy brands that make intrusive adverts. But, they must also know that. So I can only assume that the majority of people don’t think the same and it’s an overall upside for these annoying ads.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Adblockers are not that difficult to install, so I’d guess the slice of people who really resent ads enough to actually make purchasing decisions out of spite but also who still watch them isn’t that big.

    • blx@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That baffles me too. Being annoyed by an obnoxious ad instantly puts the brand in my naughty, to-boycott list.

      Like, if I ever need to use a VPN, guess who I’ll go out of my way to never, ever use? That’s right NordVPN, go fuck yourself! I’ve never used you and I already hate you.

      How do people care so little that it’s still a beneficial strategy for brands?

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I just assume that anyone who needs to spend a lot on bothering me about their product… is either pushing a really shitty product, or offering it at a really shitty price, because so far that has been the case about 90% of the time.

        If it was a good value, people would spontaneously recommend it when appropriate, with only light advertising in places where it makes sense (athletic gear advertised on sports websites, for example). Hell, it doesn’t even have to be all that good a product, just better than the alternatives. I mean look at Linux! :p

        It’s so clear when you know what’s going on, but I think most people operate under the assumption that if they constantly hear about it and don’t hear bad things to the same degree, that the thing must be good. Propaganda is everywhere saying exactly that in lots of different ways, so hard to really blame them…

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          or offering it at a really shitty price

          Advertising budget has to come from somewhere. If you can afford to inundate me with constant ads, then I know your product costs way more than it needs to.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          it utterly baffles me why ads for context-relevant things are so uncommon, the only places i really see them are woodworking channels…

          Yeah you get less money from those ads, but it also means your channel won’t implode in 3 years when you accidentally advertise a company that drives customers to suicide…
          It also means you build a reputation as trustworthy, which especially these days is pretty valuable and will drive viewership.

  • gigachad@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    But you know the product and that is what is important for advertisers. Also it’s important what happens subconsciously, not so much your first reaction to it.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Personally when I need something and have seen an ad for a product that fits the need, I’ll buy it. If I’ve seen the ad so much that it’s seared into my brain, I search for the product and buy the ripoff version of it (when possible), or I DIY it.

      Edit: corrected autocorrect

    • Clasm@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If the insurance firm has a lot of money to throw at constant adds, then odds are good that they aren’t paying out premiums for their customers.

  • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Especially those sponsor segment that have nothing to do with me because i’m not from the west.

      • X@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Actual magic. Never see the sponsors, or other such annoyances. Cannot recommend it enough.

        • OmniFS@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Do be warned tho, on rare occasions segments get submitted for literally every time something is mentioned, even if it’s not part of the actual sponsorship segment. I saw a video once that had well over 10 segments and it just kept skipping them. Turned off sponsorblock to discover someone literally cut out every time they said the name of the sponsor even if it wasnt part of the actual ad.

  • desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If a person comes to my door and rings the bell after reading my sign that says, “don’t ring unless emergency”…I enjoy giving them my full vocabulary of curses. People are stupid. A person is smart.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They used to.

      Why do you see diminishing returns lately? Because more money into more ads lead to consumer fatigue.

  • emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I also sometimes consciously dislike things because of annoying ads.

    But it doesn’t matter. The overall result is that now you’re aware of that brand, you have a place for it in memory. After time passes it will be The One I’ve Heard Of unless you’re dedicated to remembering to avoid it. There’s something called the Mere Exposure Effect - it mostly works and they know it. :(

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      called the Mere Exposure Effect - it mostly works

      …is what the 90% market leader says, who profits from it the most.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If it didn’t work they wouldm’t profit from it.

        Advertising exists for a reason, and that’s becsuse it’s very effective.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s not how executives work.

          Edit: i say, it maybe works somewhat in traditional ads but not as much in annoying ads (popups, inline, in-video) as Google promises. And that executives are often enough a bit naive in promises for savings/wins (see AI programner promises vs. reality and how they still jump on it). Also, how the internet marketplace works (programmatic advertising), it’s on mere promises only anyway.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Someone should write an article about how interrupting ads actualy negatively affect consumer choices and then popularize it. I am ok even if its just made of shady stats, many will adapt the idea blindly anyways.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Someone should. I’m sure it has never been tried.

      Surely companies will ignore decades of psychological studies and own marketing experience for a random article full of made up numbers.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Except I used to work in distribution for Sears/Best Buy online delivery and I can assure you I noticed what people bought and the ads that were frequent. The more obtrusive ads saw less sales.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is the key.

      Ads don’t care if you like or don’t like them, as long as you remember them.

      The worst thing an ad can do is be forgettable

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know how having me associate their name with a spike of rage is a good thing. There are definitely companies I went from being neutral towards to never considering them again due to their advertising methods. For example I’ve never eaten at Quiznos because of those fucking rat commercials they did like 20 years ago. I’m not even sure if that place still exists or not. I hope not, and I hope whoever came up with those commercials is dead.

      • howsetheraven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Every single ad these days go into a memory black hole. They are so irritating, so invasive, so EVERYWHERE; that I instinctively dissociate from anything in them.

        They won’t get my conscious or subconscious attention. All of my large purchases are researched a minimum 2 weeks in advance and anything small is done on a case by case basis (of which I intentionally scrutinize anything I might have “heard of” because I’m aware of the phenomenon. Fuck all ads, they are my enemy.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Disagree.

        I may be in the minority but the more I know about you, the less I ever want you in my house.

        I will literally go by an LG Washing Machine out of spite because Sony showed up too much in ads.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          They are playing statistics, most people that think they are immune to ads are full of shit and even if they somehow defy common human behavior it isn’t really relevant to an advertising effort that doesn’t care about the minority.

    • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Gaming has become such bullshit in this regard.

      I mean it’s so rare nowadays to come across a game where you can tell: this is made by someone who genuinely wanted to make this game for the sake of making/playing it.

      It’s always just another micro transaction storefront with graphics.

      And ads aren’t any different, contrived bullshit.

      • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Good games are the ones without this problem; usually indie games are the good ones because greedy executives are not involved in them.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          at this point i barely even register anything published by larger companies, every now and then i catch a brief glimpse of some new big release that is apparently being played by literally 3% of the entire global population, and that is the ONLY time i ever hear about it, never to be seen again.

          It’s kind of bizarre

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        *mainstream gaming.

        There’s still a world out there not bothered by this. I’m a big spender but AAA gaming lost me a while ago. On all systems I’ve got more games to play than I could ever have the time for.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          this kind of thing applies to so much these days, another notable example being “oh social media sucks, oh i constantly get annoying notifications”

          holy fucking shit just stop using the bad social media platforms, turn off your notifications, this is an extremely easily solved problem that can be tackled in an afternoon!

    • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Does anybody actually PLAY raid shadow legends, or is it just an ad for nothing? I don’t think I’ve ever seen the actual game play or heard anyone ever mention playing it.

  • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve held this attitude ever since those Mentos commercials used to interrupt my Much Music in the 90s. These type-A marketing types rarely realized they’re just advertising to themselves.