• tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That being said, I do think EGS is going the correct route by investing in games / unique games and locking them into their platform.

    I strongly disagree. I quit consoles because of the exclusivity nonsense, and EGS guaranteed I will never buy anything from them by doing that shit. I won’t even redeem free games on their platform via Prime Gaming, just on principle.

    You compete by giving devs and publishers a better cut, or convincing them to do deeper sales on your platform. You compete by providing a better service to users. You do not compete by literally not competing.

    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, exclusive games is the only thing Nintendo really has going for, and it’s working. And those games being first or third party isn’t really making much difference for the final user.

      Only real difference is hardware lock in.

      • Nikelui@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t particularly like the direction that Nintendo has taken in recent years, but are you willing to ignore that they were the only company in the market for handheld gaming until very recently? It’s not just game exclusives.

      • tomkatt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I quit consoles because of the exclusivity nonsense

        Nintendo was included in that statement.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          But you’re not the market. So this not working for you doesn’t mean it’s a bad strategy, and Nintendo is an example of a company who pulled this off.