You must log in or # to comment.
The whole Tolerance Paradox thing, yk
This solution always made sense to me:
Another solution is to place tolerance in the context of social contract theory: to wit, tolerance should not be considered a virtue or moral principle, but rather an unspoken agreement within society to tolerate one another’s differences as long as no harm to others arises from same. In this formulation, one being intolerant is violating the contract, and therefore is no longer protected by it against the rest of society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance?wprov=sfla1
The cure for fascism is… politically-motivated threats of brutal physical violence? That’s literally fascism.
Hate this. This is not fascism. It’s arguably not even one of the tenets of fascism. That user has no clue what they’re talking about.
The reply under it was pretty good though.
It’s always morally correct to beat the shit out of Nazis. And if they don’t like that, they can always stop being Nazis.
