I haven’t gone deep into Marxist content on YouTube and the other reason I’m looking for suggestions is because I’ve had enough of the slanderization of communism on the internet. I don’t know any certain ML youtubers but it would be nice if you guys give me some channels to find out.


Unlearning Economics is not a Marxist and I don’t even know if he is a leftist. At best he is a liberal progressive.
He has a few good videos, but his wrong criticism of the LTV is a disservice to people trying to learn Marxist theory. Thankfully, Victor Magariño refuted him thoroughly and completely. Bad Empanada also refuted Unlearning Economics defense of neoliberal economists.
If you want to learn Marxism from a modern economics perspective, I’d recommend Victor Magariño and The Marxist Project. Paul Cockshott is also very good regarding economics, but be aware he is a bigot with many anti-LGBTQs remarks. I’d also recommend Anwar Sheikh’s lectures but they are advanced, and not for people who are starting to learn.
Only watched one video from them and found it a massive swing and a miss.
And because I hate vague posting:
(Parts of this are translated so apologies if it’s not perfect).
His analysis of contemporary imperialism falls into a blind worship of the superficial aspects of globalization, making fatal theoretical compromises. He readily dismisses the reality of the imperialist bloc as outdated Kautskyism, while ignoring the core tools of contemporary imperialism’s rule.
Denying the existence of the imperialist bloc ignores the dollar’s hegemony and its associated international financial institutions. The US-led imperialist group, through the dollar’s international reserve currency status and tools like the IMF and World Bank, is systematically reaping wealth from the Global South. He imagines an ideal equalization of profit rates resulting from free capital flow, ignoring the reality of the global network of exploitation maintained by financial oligarchs through extra-economic coercion. This financial hegemony constitutes the most solid economic framework of the contemporary imperialist bloc, and any discussion of multipolar competition divorced from this reality inevitably slides into the trap of vulgar economism.
His use of the Global South becoming the world’s factory to negate theories of unequal exchange and dependency is a complete failure to see the forest for the trees. The restructuring of global value chains has not changed the fundamental nature of core countries’ extraction of surplus value; it has only altered the more covert form of exploitation. The core countries are able to maintain this unequal exchange primarily because of their near absolute monopoly over cutting-edge military technology and high-tech industrial chains. This technological monopoly is not simply a result of market competition, but is forcibly maintained through the massive military machinery and intellectual property barriers of imperialism. While the Southern countries undertake the most arduous stages of physical production, they receive only meager processing profits, while the vast majority of surplus value is continuously drawn back to the core countries through technological rents and financial scissors. His simplistic attribution of this unequal exchange, built on violent monopoly, to the equalization of profit rates caused by market competition effectively obliterates the reactionary nature of monopoly capital during the imperialist stage.
It is precisely this structural oppression, interwoven with financial hegemony, technological monopoly, and military violence, that provides a solid material foundation for global resistance. In their development, the Global South faces a survival crisis: being permanently locked at the bottom of the value chain and constantly vulnerable to financial exploitation. This objectively existing structural contradiction will inevitably drive Southern countries towards unity and cooperation, gradually breaking the imperialist dependency chain by promoting local currency settlement, establishing alternative financial facilities, and deepening South-South cooperation. This unity is not based on subjective political labels or camp divisions, but rather on the objective historical requirement to break the imperialist system of exploitation.
To understand contemporary imperialism, we must see beyond the surface of global division of labor and recognize its underlying monopolistic nature, characterized by the collusion of finance, technology, and violence. Only by acknowledging the objective existence of the imperialist camp and its oppressive mechanisms can we truly find a realistic path to the liberation of the Global South.
I swear every video I saw from him was good. I’m not a lib I swear
I’m not trying to condemn you personally, sir. You can watch whatever video you want, it is not my problem. What I am saying is that Unlearning Economics is not a marxist, which if the content of the post. Yes, UnlEco has good videos, but that is it. I wouldn’t recommend to someone who is trying to learn marxist theory/economics or they would be confused with his views.
I know lol I was just being silly :P