A hard shell that unfolds like oragami will fit in a single Starship payload but expand to over 250k cubic meters of space (which seems impossible, that’s like 10 olympic pools) and offers practical solutions for many of the common engineering challenges with building long-term human habitations in orbit.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Huh, so it’s kind of like an inflatable module, but made of interlocking rigid panels? An interesting concept. I am undecided as to whether the increased volume would be worth the additional complexity.

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s cool to see concepts like this, even if I don’t expect anything like it to happen anytime soon.

      Another one that comes to mind is ThinkOrbital’s spherical station made from welding together ridid panels like a soccer ball.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s apparently a much bigger internal volume than you’d get with today’s inflatable tech. With the caveat, of course, that inflatable tech has been tested already and this has not (though we’ve used origami techniques to expand payloads before, like on the JWST)

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      In many ways, the engineering of a space habitat is a lot easier than a deep-sea submersible…

      A space station only needs to keep 1 atmosphere of pressure in, whereas a submarine has to keep hundreds of atmospheres of pressure out.

        • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Well, don’t lose hope. Rockets still explode in giant fireballs more often than any other form of transportation.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Hmm… Yeah that probably applies to formula 1 as well. We’d have to do the math to know for sure, but a quick Google search says that about 3% of astronauts/cosmonauts have died during a mission. I’d be surprised if the fatality rate for race car drivers is higher than that.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I was under the impression just a cloth type of thing could be vaguely in the vicinity and the airflow would send it to the hole. Its like strong enough to drag things over but not so strong it will tend to rip up the surface or something.