sanitation@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoNew compression techniquelemmy.todayimagemessage-square144linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNew compression techniquelemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square144linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSusaga@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey said “perfectly”, not “90%”. You’re trying to move the goalposts.
minus-squarehirihit640@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI just re-read their post and yes you’re right, in which case I disagree with them. “Perfect” is not achievable by any means. Maybe accurate enough to be mistaken as a twin for the real person, but not perfect
They said “perfectly”, not “90%”. You’re trying to move the goalposts.
I just re-read their post and yes you’re right, in which case I disagree with them. “Perfect” is not achievable by any means. Maybe accurate enough to be mistaken as a twin for the real person, but not perfect