The legislation takes aim directly at trans individuals using the restroom or locker rooms, threatening those who “knowingly” and “willfully” enter facilities designated for the “opposite biological sex” with prison time. A first offense would count as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail. Those caught using the bathroom in repeated offenses, however, could be convicted as felons and face up to five years in prison.

It’ll be interesting to see how this aligns with the Full Faith and Credit clause for someone who updates their birth certificate from another state that allows for that then uses the bathroom that aligns with said certificate.

  • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jaysus christo this is fucking weird and insane. And there is such an obvious, easy answer for the whole “problem” (of course there is no actual problem, this is insane fear mongering and hatred, but still…)

    America: GIVE PEOPLE (ALL PEOPLE) PRIVACY IN PUBLIC BATHROOMS. Stop using “stalls” with gaps so large there may as well not be any dividers. Just look at a European bathroom where the toilets are in their own small rooms with doors that run from floor to ceiling. Seriously, you could remove the gender separation entirely and it wouldn’t affect anything.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve got family there, it’s the Mormons who were too crazy for slc or wanted more space but same crazy bullshit dogma, and loooots of racism

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a Canadian, I could have guessed… There’s a sort of obvious pattern that’s emerged over the last couple of decades involving the less populated areas being the most deathly afraid of the world at large, thanks in large part to the sample biases incepted through social media.

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do they include a definition of “biological sex”? And of how that’s going to be determined?

    Of course not. They have no fucking clue what they’re talking about. They just want to hurt people

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If it comes up in court, I guess they’ll be forced to specify if they’re defining biological sex by chromosomes, genitalia, or some other biological feature. Unfortunately, the law was made by people who are completely oblivious to the complexity of biological sex. This is why people shouldn’t be allowed to make laws without knowing the science if these things. Same thing with anti-abortion laws being made by people who don’t understand biology