Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 month agoWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?message-squaremessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoNo, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
minus-squareStarya67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoJuries should not make medical decisions anyway. Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoJuries shouldn’t make decisions period.
minus-squareLady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoFrom what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThat is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.
No, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
Juries should not make medical decisions anyway.
Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
Juries shouldn’t make decisions period.
From what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.