• inari@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sure, money is no problem for Asia and Africa, right?

    Let’s blow money on something that will produce results after 20 years for much more money than renewables + storage (if it doesn’t get canceled along the way after delays and cost overruns)

      • inari@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing that justifies a higher power bill than with renewables, and a new reliance on foreign fuel

        • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re referring to plutonium production, which many states, especially now, may consider a worthwhile justification for the extra expenditures.

    • IncogCyberSpaceUser@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nuclear powerplants take that long because of extreme regulations, many of which are just total nonsense. They can be built at reasonable speeds, especially newer tech.
      The spent material storage is also a non issue.
      It’s honestly the biggest fumble in terms of energy production in the last decades. We fucked it.

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And this assumes China doesn’t figure out liquid salt reactors which seems likely at this point.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not all of Africa is a giant desert, or even that close to the equator.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not what I say at all. But if it’s feasible in Europe, closer to the equator it must be a no brainer.