if the proof is that no Spiritual influence has ever occurred on Earth we would need to give a natural explanation for each and every miracle and spiritual miracle that appeared in human history which would be next to impossible to do
you have replaced my question with a nearly impossible premise with your argument
why would I? when you asserted they were naturalistic. I made no such assertions on the topic and merely asked a question. so the burden of proof falls on you
that is Petitio Principii
if the proof is that no Spiritual influence has ever occurred on Earth we would need to give a natural explanation for each and every miracle and spiritual miracle that appeared in human history which would be next to impossible to do
you have replaced my question with a nearly impossible premise with your argument
No, you would first need to prove any of those things actually happened. The ones in the Bible are just made up stories with no evidence.
why would I? when you asserted they were naturalistic. I made no such assertions on the topic and merely asked a question. so the burden of proof falls on you
no point debating with someone who fundamentally misunderstands the principals. good luck with your endeavours.