Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.
I didn’t say you stated it. It is the assumption with which you began this argument.
my assumption??? I think you mean your assumption. cause I didnt state God exist
Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.