The “nothing” was the evidence in favor of aether or spontaneous generation. They were disproved simply by demonstrating that the phenomena attributed to those processes had causes which better fit the observed reality. You have not provided a single phenomena for which God would be a more plausible cause than natural processes.
he proved the aether does not exist
he proved that maggots didnt sponetaenously generate from meat
he proved that cholera wasnt a air borne disease
they have proven negative claims, so why cant you?
They disproved those things by revealing the lack of evidence in their favor. Which has been done countless times in this thread.
their entire experimentation and documentation was a bit more than nothing pal
The “nothing” was the evidence in favor of aether or spontaneous generation. They were disproved simply by demonstrating that the phenomena attributed to those processes had causes which better fit the observed reality. You have not provided a single phenomena for which God would be a more plausible cause than natural processes.