I like how they had the stretcher immediately ready for him.

  • stickly@lemmy.world
    0·
    14 days ago

    If you look closely you can spot the exact moment where the robot gained sentience and chose to self destruct rather than live as a dancing monkey. It really is amazing how fast tech advances these days

    • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
      0·
      14 days ago

      on the phone

      Sir we know for a fact it achieved sentience. Yes sir we’re positive. Because it killed itself immediately. Yes sir. Just “Oh no” and then killed itself. Yes sir immediately.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      0·
      15 days ago

      Not all robots are equal, that’s why there’s like a dozen companies trying to make them…

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zipEnglish
      0·
      15 days ago

      Highly doubt it. The video looks too gritty to be AI. There’s a lot of janky zooms, camera movements etc, if this was AI, it would be incredibly impressive, and probably kinda scary aswell.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        15 days ago

        The video I linked I shows the Intree robot running at 10 m/s…that’s a sub 3 minute mile. Anything so janky that there is a stretcher sitting by the starting line is either staged or generated. No company that is serious about the field is going to show themselves as being slthat far behind their competitors.

        • M137@lemmy.today
          0·
          15 days ago

          That is so fucking dumb that I can’t even explain it, your comment that is. I felt my own brain cells imploding from just reading it.

            • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
              0·
              15 days ago

              Are you certain that there is a claim that the company responsible for the tripping robot put this out as a piece of publicity?
              Because if not, if it was a leak, or taken by someone not affiliated, then it would make sense it’s on the internet.

              Or, are you arguing that because there exists a robot which can run reliably at 10 m s-1, that this one shouldn’t exist?
              Because my car goes 0-60 slower than a McMurtry Speirling, and yet it exists.

              • Dr. Bob@lemmy.caEnglish
                0·
                14 days ago

                I’m suggesting that any company that has a robot that does this is in deep fucking trouble. They should pull an Allbirds and do an AI pump and dump because they are far behind the market.

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zipEnglish
          0·
          14 days ago

          is either staged or generated. No company that is serious about the field is going to show themselves as being slthat far behind their competitors.

          Have you even thought about the fact that this is most likely not the company releasing it, but rather a smartphone video made by some random bystander? It could also be a fairly old video of an early prototype - if I remember right, spaceX has once released a video with a bunch of rocket launch fails for the funsies. Or hell, maybe it’s a school project of some engineering students. Nobody really knows the context.

          Your claim of that video being AI has nothing to do with the video, but simply “other companies are further than this lol” which is honestly a pretty stupid standpoint. You should analyze the video itself for any hints of being AI generated.

        • Banana@sh.itjust.works
          0·
          15 days ago

          Who says this company has the same financial resources as that one?

          Who says the video you shared is not significantly newer than the one OP shared?

          Who says this is even a company made robot? This could be an engineering competition for all we know.

          You called it AI based on a comparison with no logical basis behind why that would mean it’s AI, not based on any actual reason or tell within the video.

          I can see several reasons why this is not an AI video within the video. The background is too consistent, trees and the fence stay in the same place. Things that go off camera come back on camera look the same as before.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      0·
      15 days ago

      It isn’t AI, main way to know is the one guys green gloves stay on even when they are out of sight long periods of time. None of the current models can handle that.

      These robots just have quite powerful motors that control arms/legs, so when it goes wrong, it can easily destroy itself with spectacular fashion.

      • thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        0·
        15 days ago

        People who aren’t mechanics or engineers in a robotics or manufacturing field don’t realize just how powerful and fast a servo motor actually is. Especially without a speed-reducing gearbox. Even a modestly small vpl servo can do vast amounts of damage if installed incorrectly or if it comes loose from a mount or coupling.

    • Oka@sopuli.xyz
      0·
      15 days ago

      I replayed it a few times, and it feels that way:

      • At the beginning, dude in the white vest on the left looks like he’s resting an arm on the fence in the background.

      • During the video at the top right, a clipboard is seen, then a megaphone, then the camera pans and we see a megaphone with a rolled up paper. It feels like incontinuity.

      • When the stretcher came out, it looked like 2 dudes came out holding separate pieces that conjoined later (they are connected though)

      • Several people start appearing at the end of the video that we didn’t see in the video prior

      • The dude in the reflective vest at the beginning isnt seen later

      A lot of incontinuity that gives us false positives.