New York — New York’s mayor marked the third anniversary of Hamas’ October 7 attacks on Israel on Wednesday with a statement that has sparked backlash among some Jewish leaders.
In his statement, Mayor Zohran Mamdani acknowledged the “horrific war crimes of October 7” while also accusing Israel of committing war crimes and genocide in Gaza.

The mayor was met with boos as he arrived at a vigil in remembrance of October 7 on Wednesday night in Union Square, video from CNN affiliate WABC showed. He is set to attend a meeting with Palestinian New Yorkers following the vigil, according to his public schedule.

“This day is profoundly painful for so many New Yorkers. It marks three years since the horrific war crimes of October 7. On that day, Hamas killed more than 1,100 Israelis and abducted 251 others. We grieve alongside our many friends and neighbors who still carry that unthinkable loss,” Mamdani wrote in his statement.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s called having a backbone. For all of the whining and bitching from people about how politicians are bought and have no backbone, observe what that actually looks like and kindly eat shit if you don’t like it.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Sure, Israel has committed war crimes and genocide per Geneva and UN definitions. So has HAMAS, Iran, Hezbollah, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, et al.

      • cinoreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        You sure NONE of these countries have committed genocide? I see Iran and Saudi in that list too.

          • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Oh dear.

            You shouldn’t discuss the Middle East without doing some serious reading. Even Iran admits they commit genocide. It’s like their motto.

            • cinoreus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Exactly, almost every country in the list is guilty of genocide. I don’t know much about Hezbollah, but only someone born yesterday would think Iran is innocent. Like hell literally few months ago Iran was massacring it’s own citizens, and that news somehow flew off his radar? Also has this guy never heard of Saddam Hussain?

              • davel@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                almost every country in the list is guilty of genocide.

                If you don’t even know what the term “genocide” means, then don’t vomit up nonsense about it.

              • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Their own citizens who the mossad admitted were mossad agents on the ground, lol? What kind of radar do you have where you missed that one?

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Even Iran admits they commit genocide.

              Who has Iran admitted to genociding? Why do you just make up shit like this without evidence while pretending you’ve read anything “serious”? No one’s fooled by your midwittery.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Don’t be ridiculous, you really don’t have a clue.

        Read the UN definition of genocide (note: that’s why I said “UN definition”. It was a clue for you). They’ve all committed genocide with regularity for your entire lifetime.

        You are wrong, inject another speedball, friend.

        https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition

        Hundreds of thousands in Syria are dead, 10x the losses of Israel vs. Palestine (at the least). You’re oblivious

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Israel hasn’t killed that many Hamas in retaliation but they have killed 1000x more Palestinians after October 7 and even long before then and there’s plenty of video evidence to support his statement and a lot of it is self incriminating.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      If you look at the age distribution of Palestinians that died since then, it is pretty similar to the demographic which is what you would get if you indiscriminately bombed a country.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The news is reporting as accused and will do so until some tribunal adjudicates that a genocide occurs. Until then it is libel.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Libel? Then I would love to see the discovery phase for this. You can literally see that it is a genocide from outer space. Go ahead and sign me up for that lawsuit ya spineless chicken shits.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yes but it has to be an official finding before the media can report it as such. Until then, it’s an allegation.

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Facts is a defense, you don’t need to wait for it

            Besides, you already have those official findings by multiple international organizations

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              There are ethical standards. They will get sued, no possibility of it not happening. You advocate for that?

              • Binturong@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                Ethical standards for thee but not for me, said the administration. tRump himself personally slanders and libels private citizens regularly, and pretty well anybody he doesn’t like without hesitation or account. At a certain point the standards are being weaponized, just like their politics has done with civility. I think if they took a principaled stand and got sued, they could win, and I do support that actually. Will that happen? No.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                Yes, I advocate for having higher ethical standards even if it means a genocidal regime sues you. Hearing someone make excuses for pedophiles and genociders as an appeal to ethical standards is pathetic.

  • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Alternate headline: On the 3rd anniversary of October 7 attacks, Mamdani commended as he accuses Israel of genocide and war crimes

    • Dearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Did you know that Zionist has been used as a slur for longer than either Palestine or Israel was a state? Now you do.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Is it really a slur of the people it’s about chose the term themselves?

        It’s become a dirty word because of their actions, but it was their own moniker. The lovers of Zion.

        • Dearth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yes. Black people in America use the N word for themselves. But it is still clearly a slur. i cannot believe you asked that question in good faith.

          • Akasazh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            You say ‘still use’ because originally it was derogatory, in the case of Zionists is themselves who originated the term, which they saw as positives.

            My point, which you choose to ignore, is that they themselves turned itinto a slur by their behaviour.

            • Dearth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Your dad has pet names for your mom. If a stranger uses those pet names for your mom, your dad will be justifiably angry.

                • Dearth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  It’s not an analogy it’s a demonstration of my point. Groups can use language internally that is offensive when used externally.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            So what are we supposed to call the political ideology championed by Theodor Herzl? I wonder if he had anything to say about this himself. Anyway

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            You believe the n-word is a slur that black people chose for themselves? Because reclamation and choosing a label for yourself are two incredibly different things.

      • deft@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Literally don’t care. They’re supremacists.

        People who have very German names have been called Nazis both as a joke and as an insult. Doesn’t change anything. It’s your actions. If you’re being an asshole and not a Nazi and someone calls you a Nazi, it means nothing it’s just like being called an asshole.

        Zionists are antisemitic. Palestinians are a semitic people. Zionists are bigots and racial supremacists. Disgusting people.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          So. The term anti-semitism was made up by anti-Jewish racist Germans in the 19th century. It was supposed to be a more “scientific-sounding” alternative to the older term, Judenhass (lit. “Jew-hatred”) that would be more palatable to the gentile German people. At the time (1870’s or so) few people in Europe were too much concerned with what was actually going on with Palestinians or Arabs in general.

          This is why you see a lot of pro-Israel folks still use “anti-semitism” as shorthand for “anti-Jewish racism” today. The term, read literally, initially seems to include racism against all “Semitic” people as well (which is… what exactly? I truly don’t know, is it every ethnic group who speaks a Semitic language?). But the very term “anti-semitism” is just itself an old dog whistle for “jew-hatred” that is now becoming a cudgel that pro-Israeli folks use to bully folks into ignoring Israeli war crimes. Anyway

          • deft@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Yes but the word literally has an actual definition now that means the complete opposite of literally. Words and their definitions only hold so much water before people can just decide what they actually mean.

            So I refuse to let zionists own the term and believe it should be used to point out their hypocrisy. Zionists are antisemitic, I’d argue they’re the most antisemitic group.

            Also the whole concept of ethnic groups is unserious it’s made up grouping that I guess can be used to help specify what someone is talking about but overall it’s a group of languages and as far as I know the only ethnic group that derives their identity in this way which is extremely odd, to me at least.

        • Dearth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          nazi as a name has never been used as a tool of oppression of a minority group. Zionist has. Isreal is currently committing a genocide. Zionist is a word that has been used to besmirch, denigrate and ‘other’ Jewish people for over a century. If you want to critique the actions of Netenyahu’s government please do loudly and often. But you don’t have to do it with a slur.

          • deft@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            But it has and currently is. In Russia the lie about denazification has been the justification for invading Ukraine. It’s also been used to delegitimize protests specifically in Hong Kong in 2019 where people were told the protesters were fascists, nazis and radicals.

            On top of that Zionism and Zionist is not a slur. People identify as zionist. That’s why the comparison to Nazi is perfectly apt both are ideologies people openly embrace.

            In the same light Nazi can be slung as an insult so can Zionist but that doesn’t make it a slur it is a legitimate neutral political term just like Nazi.

              • deft@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Tl;dr. Russia is full of fucking nazis nationalistic, supremacist, and imperial monarchists.

                First there are Nazis literally in every country. Supremacist minded nationalistic racists exist regardless of borders.

                Second Russia is absolutely NOT the country to worry about denazification. They fund far right, nationalistic and supremacists in Ukraine. It’s literally so easy to Google this information - Dmitry Rogozin, Igor Girkin and Konstantin Malofeev, Viktor Medvedchuk. These are all individuals that to one degree or another fit this description, operate to destabilize Ukraine from within for Russian interest

                Third. No. Ukraine is not full of Nazis. Russia is lying.

                Fourth. The reason Russia is invading is because the Ukrainian people went into the streets in mass during the Maidan protests and expelled the Russian stooge. Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign an agreement with the EU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union–Ukraine_Association_Agreement which the people and the majority of the rest of the Ukrainian government supported. It was an attempt to subvert democracy. After his expulsion Russia immediately invaded.

                Fifth. Russia will claim Ukraine was gearing up for war. Yet Russia had already invaded Georgia due to their increasing relationship with the EU. It’s so fucking clear why Russia invaded. It’s not over Nazis.

                Sixth. Russian actions in Africa through the African Corps and Wagner involve torture, execution, disproportionate violence, imperialism and expulsion of people from their land.

                The list of hypocrisy is absurd. If anyone has a Nazi problem it’s fucking Russia. MAYBE you could argue Ukraine has the same amount of nationalistic supremacists as Russia, as all countries have a degree of nationalistic racial supremacists and I point back to my first point. However Ukraine doesn’t engage in the degree of violence, culture erasure and disregard for humanity as Russia does.

                But again, all of this is irrelevant to argue because it’s a fucking lie. Ukraine fought for what they chose for themselves as a sovereign nature during the Maidan protests and Russia did not like that so they absolutely fucking lied and claimed denazification, turned a three day special operation into this and the simple fact is their war of aggression and desire for control over a sovereign nation is fucking gross. Their violence is disgusting and the war crimes Russia commits in order to terrorize people is horrifying and inexcusable.

                Russia is absolutely, unequivocally, the fucking bad guy. And even just asking me what you asked me makes you a prick and a half because it’s a pathetic loaded question in an attempt to justify Russia’s lying bullshit.

  • blackshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    The man who beats kittens daily is outraged that people accused him to be an animal abuser on the 3rd anniversary of the time a cat scratched him.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Where are all those people who were trying to shit talk about him because he didn’t say genocide enthusiastically enough in an interview once before. You can call terrorists terrorists and genocide genocide without any contradictions.