• Vincentmario@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    It says “stolen by child eating pedophiles”. The preposition “by” takes a noun phrase as its object.That noun phrase is “child eating pedophiles”. The head noun is clearly pedophiles. “child eating” is a modifier (a compound/participle phrase) describing those pedophiles

    Hyphenation would make it clearer, but its absence doesn’t suddenly create a new valid reading where “child” becomes a separate noun or the main object

    Gamer and yeah

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      “Child eating” is not a compound modifier, that’s what the hyphen does. Without a hyphen, the modifiers “child” and “eating” both independently describe “pedophiles”, the hyphen makes “child-eating” into the compound adjective the author was obviously intending to convey. Wikipedia uses the example “heavy-metal detector”. Without the hyphen, you have a metal detector that’s heavy. If you need a device to detect heavy-metals, your SOL.

      Absolutely no clue what “gamer and yeah” means 🤷‍♂️

      • Vincentmario@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Hyphens clarify compounds, they don’t create them. Grammatically, ‘child eating’ modifies ‘pedophiles’, the head noun. Reading ‘child’ as its own noun would require ‘a child’ or a different construction, which isn’t what’s written.