“We have sarin chemical weapons in Maryland. These nerve agents, if sprayed on people, cause their lungs to stop, their hearts to stop, nothing works… and we have them here.”
Andrew Hugg, a leading US nuclear scientist, reveals that the US military still possesses chemical weapons and that they are stored in a Maryland laboratory.
The US joined the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1997 and supposedly destroyed them all by 2023… but it seems they lied again. Epstein’s empire respects neither laws nor conventions; it is governed only by barbarity.
He also acknowledges U.S. airstrikes have killed children in Iran, calling it “collateral damage,” and revealed to the journalist how nuclear launch decisions are made in real time.
Hugg described how the United States could assassinate Iran’s next leader if he “doesn’t change,” while admitting the U.S. has no plans to use nuclear weapons: “We’re not going to nuke anybody.”
All of this was casually revealed to an undercover journalist in a restaurant. This raises serious questions about this official’s judgment, security, and what’s really happening behind closed doors.
Video link -> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2046820915531419648/vid/avc1/1920x1080/-SIsfZzUx1gj4yod.mp4
More complete interview here -> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2046615306387521536/vid/avc1/1920x1080/BK3sBl0L_ndgbLa_.mp4
Source -> https://xcancel.com/DaniMayakovski/status/2046821073086226742#m
and https://xcancel.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2046642621632872461
I’m not sure if it’s confirmed where covid originated. I just know the so-called “Spanish Flu” is believed to have originated in the US (a good case study in misleading naming). And the US manufacturing a narrative to pin blame on China tracks with its usual projecting and with a story like this, of the US having chemical weapons in spite of saying it’s getting rid of them. So whether covid came from the US or not, it seems much more likely it came from there than that it came from China.
That’s not very good evidence. Many things can seem like other things without actually being the same.
The warring states during the first world War had very harsh media censorship because of…well the whole war thing. Ergo when Spanish coverage started popping up due to the lack of censorship there, people assumed it originated from Spain. To this day we don’t actually know where the flu came from specifically. Covid is harder to track, due to the long incubation period.
Not saying there can’t be discussion on the matter, it just requires more evidence to be considered is all.
A lot of things we work out about the empire don’t have obvious evidence up until the point that they do. Although wild speculation is not helpful, it is possible to infer and that’s what I’m doing, is inferring about likelihood. As I said, “it seems much more likely” not “it is the case that” as a means of comparison.
The rhetorical point in the first place was that, according to the information in this thread, the US has chemical weapons that it claims to have destroyed. And that this is the same country claiming another country was being irresponsible with (if not malicious with) chemicals and caused a global pandemic. We know the empire has a tendency to accuse others of things it is doing. This doesn’t mean it’s always automatically the case, but again, inferring about likelihood; if a person is hedging on trust, don’t trust the entity that keeps showing up as a liar.