Furthermore, that’s under 6000 dollars per apartment. For what I presume are some of the worst apartments in the city that’s not bad at all. I’m assuming it’s stuff like mold, major leaks, recarpeting, and whatever else someone living with their parents wouldn’t know about.
34 million and only 6000 apartments.
Efficiency is the key issue everyone fails at here.
He needs to aim bigger, to solve most problems with one stroke.
Improvements take time.
It’s possible he’s collected (or even just invoiced) the money, but the work is still being planned/completed.
Furthermore, that’s under 6000 dollars per apartment. For what I presume are some of the worst apartments in the city that’s not bad at all. I’m assuming it’s stuff like mold, major leaks, recarpeting, and whatever else someone living with their parents wouldn’t know about.
How do you eat an elephant?
To quote Gavin “It would take several days of munching and chewing.”
You start by killing the elephant.
Problem is too many Dems are trying to work with the elephant to reach a consensus.
It’s an expression. The answer is “one bite at a time.” When dealing with a large problem, you have to break it down into many small parts.
6000 in 4 months with the system he inherited is still more that previously. Why do you think this is his final goal? Of course he’s aiming higher.
As opposed to… 0 million spent and 0 apartments improved on the last 25 years?
He’s a mayor not a dictator…
Username checks out