• root@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the church will never do gay couple blessings as they are sinful and they cannot engage and support sin

    support the sinners, not the sin

    • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since the “they” modifies the church, that means the church is sinful? Agreed. In that case, what…Christians support the paedophiles, not the paedophilia?

      • root@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “they” refers to the act of homosexuality im european (not british nor american) so forgive my grammar

        • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Apologies for playing grammar games, but I will absolutely condemn your bigoted ideas.

          The church, as with most people, does not separate people from their sexuality. The phrase “love the sinner, hate the sin” is disingenuous at best, allowing hatred to continue, but with the thin veneer of civility that makes the bigots feel comfortable in their smug judgement. That is 100% garbage and you and I both know this.

          Stop defending inhumane institutions and be a better person.

          • root@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            We love the sinners Hate the sin we love the people we love ALL people we hate NO people

            • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Repeating the lie does not make it true. I’ve seen Christian “love” in action. Much of the time it is two-faced, disingenuous, and conditional. Not all Christians are like this of course, but enough are that it’s become a standard.

              Perhaps you are a good person who just happens to swallow the lies of religion. I know people like that as well - people who are good not because of their religious upbringing but in spite of it. I hope some day you realise you have it within you to be more moral, kind, and accepting than the religious organisation you follow. And to do it without them.

              • root@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                those people are the loud minority visit a Monastery, Frater.

                • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Literally said “not all Christians” but my point still stands. And I have better things to do than visit a religious institution I don’t respect.

          • root@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            and in the 1700s “an good person” meant someone who didnt beat their slave

              • root@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                This was in the BCs and it does not apply anymore

                “Moral” and “Good” standards change every year

                in 20 years, the best person you know could be absolute evil

      • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If a paedophile is demonstrating repentance and wanting to turn away from paedophilia, then yes, we should forgive and support them in not practicing paedophilia.

        • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They had better demonstrate more than repentance, and there had better be legal recourse, victim-guided restitution and safeguards established. None of this “just move Father Barnes to a congregation in El Salvador and hide all documentation without doing anything further” garbage, as the church has done consistently forever.

      • root@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        we are all sinners

        and the Church supports EVERYBODY not their sins

        If Adolf Hitler walked into the Church, he would be allowed to confess his sins and become a Catchumen