FauxLiving, a paper isn’t the same as you predicting the future. It does not show the system works. It is disgusting that you pretend to be an astrologer based on these opinions.
FauxLiving, the burden of proof is on you to show us why your AI utopian vision will happen as you predict it. A paper does not guarantee your fantasy.
First, this is a peer-reviewed result not me expressing my hopes.
Second, this application does not replace radiologists. It is a tool for radiologists in one specific type of diagnosis.
If you have some hypothetical future outcome in mind, then the burden of proof is on you to prove your position, not on me to disprove it.
The data shows that this system works.
FauxLiving, a paper isn’t the same as you predicting the future. It does not show the system works. It is disgusting that you pretend to be an astrologer based on these opinions.
FauxLiving, the burden of proof is on you to show us why your AI utopian vision will happen as you predict it. A paper does not guarantee your fantasy.