• loppy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That is literally the entire point of the study. How is that misleading?

      • loppy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The very first sentence is

        A new study examined the impact of alcohol consumption in healthy adults who did not report drinking more than the accepted ‘low-risk’ alcohol limits.

        Which makes it very clear that by “little” in the title (they do not say “little” in the article) they mean “below the low-risk limit”, and that “low-risk” is a technically defined term. Here is also the very first sentence of the abstract of the paper which the article is about, which they link to and is free to read:

        Low-level alcohol consumption at or below current guidelines (≤1 standard drink equivalent/day for females, ≤2 standard drink equivalents/day for males)

        What more do you want?

        • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          2 drinks a day is a lot of alcohol imo. I’d love a study that looks at more normal amounts of alcohol (imo being less than 0.5 drinks a day on average)

          • loppy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think one of the main points of this study is exactly to show that studying such smaller quantities would be worthwhile and could have tangible health implications