• LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t have it saved and i gotta go mow my stupid yard but this is similar

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7987002/

    It looks like someone did eventually talk about it enough for there to be a snopes page for it where they say yea dawg that’s a true fact

    Im on my phone and that site loads so fucking slow but i think they might have linked to the stuff talking about CBD binding to the spike protein, inhibiting its ability to enter cells, whereas the first link only talks about various immune processes getting affected

    Anyway yea i think it’s pretty fucked to death crazy that CBD seems to lower infections by up to 90% and it’s gotten exactly 0% of the attention ivermectin, something that can easily kill you, has

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      These are not studies on actual use on humans in the real world, it is on cells in a petri dish, so if you were to take from this “I don’t need to vax or mask, I take CBD” you’d be just like the Invermectin crowd.

      • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        If what i linked ain’t it feel free to look for it yourself but no, when i say “an order of magnitude reduced infections” i mean i literally read groups of individuals taking cbd experiencing 90% fewer infections than control

        I know what fucking in vitro is you fuckin twat, blocked

        i was a biology major and went into college with half a degree of credits and a literal perfect score on the bio SAT2 but yes i need a pedant to tell me shit like i don’t already know about freshman level terminology because they’re too lazy to read “this is not the study i read initially”