• I wouldn’t consider it in a vacuum. I also look at intent and consequences. Did they omit info to gain advantage over others, or were they refusing to tell a Nazi where they hid the jews? Did their choice lead to a better outcome for everyone, or did it cause chaos and disrupt lives needlessly?

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You are either answering the wrong question, or are defining a lie based on some criteria I don’t recognize.

      Telling a Nazi there are no Jews in my basement is a lie. The only way it’s not a lie is if there are, in fact, no Jews in my basement. But it is not wrong to lie to a Nazi.

    • charokol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      A lie is still a lie, even if it’s told to a Nazi or if there’s an otherwise good outcome

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pretty sure not telling the nazi is still a lie. But an example of when it is ethical to lie.

    • rynn@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Your point highlights the fact that lies are a tool. The intentional omission is a lie.

      Judgment about the tool’s use is subjective.

      Everyone uses this tool. Calling someone a liar is either calling them a human or it means you’re saying they use the tool more than they should which is yet another subjective judgment.