• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Of course a submarine’s systems won’t be connected to the internet, but using a Windows base with a “Custom Support Agreement” still gives a private US corporation the power to cripple their subs.
    IMO something so critical to defense should be built by British developers, and based on OpenBSD.

    • Arcanoloth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree, but then I’m one of those really hardcore libre-software-only nutcases ;-)

      EDIT: Though, to be fair, the Trident Missiles they carry are US-made, too, so…

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      gives a private US corporation the power to cripple their subs.

      You, umm, probably shouldn’t look up who maintains the trident missiles those subs carry…

        • RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I bet it’s Adobe. Turns out making or maintaining nukes isn’t really that hard or expensive. It’s just the subscription to Adobe Apocalypse that’s the real blocker for most economies.

    • supamanc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Further to this, there isn’t a ‘launch the nuclear weapons’ application which controls things. Windows is used for the day to day admin - producing the paperwork required in any organisation - but the actual control systems, for the submarine, the weapons the reactor etc are not running off windows.