Wait, you think I’m ALSO not complaining about the author setting up pure rage-bait with the least context possible in order to leave interpretation open to the broadest available set of people who will get upset and pontificate at eachother?
… but at the same time, the audience has seen hundreds of these. How the fuck are y’all not bored of ignoring all but the most self-serving narrative by now?
Lastly, bitches do be that way - I don’t even have a problem with it. Y’all want to applaud both the girl (possibly)trying to make another girl jealous, and the girl getting jealous, but villainize any man who exists in their space with enough spatial-awareness to notice their efforts.
THAT DUDE COULD BE GAY OR SINGLE, notice the one lady’s style, upset her by not giving a specific performative response or keeping his ugly eyes elsewhere, and the girl he’s walking with would still give him shit both for using his eyes as she herself almost certainly has for what evolution put them there for, and for not backing her take that “that thirsty bitch needs to put on more clothes”.
People are allowed to be thirsty. Policing eachother’s gaze is no more laudable than trying to control the competition’s attire, and all fall short next to either the guy or the girl having the sincerity to shout “You go girl!!” The worst barely-concealed thirst offers versus all that is discretion and a lack of effort.
I understand your confusion because I’m talking about both what the comic is depicting, and what REAL WOMEN in THE REAL WORLD have the freedom to say and do.
…but if you think the comics creator is trying to depict a gay man checking out someone’s style whilst the person next to them is expressing jealousy. Then I think you need your eyes checked.
That is NOT what the comic is about… And even if it were you’re skipping the fact that the conversation is about how media depictions (so yes, we are discussing the media) contains messages that effect women in the real world.
Also, policing and thinking about people’s gaze is part of social communication. Sarte writes about this in Being and Nothingness. If you watch this video you’ll see it’s about solitude and self, you too by feeling your natural gaze is being “policed” are ALSO experiencing “The Gaze” or “The Look”…
So you’re reacting to that policing which you feel “seen” by. You are probably a male (as I am), we both, I suspect, like looking at tits. I’m not trying to invalidate that process, the policing isn’t intended to stop that, it’s intended to get certain messages and social boundaries around that “corrected”.
… BECAUSE this comic, is a type of misinformation, where women are naturally contradictory, rather than their behavior being a construction and imposition of outside gender rules …which media like this, is propaganda to reinforce.
I think I’ve seen the things I’ve described happen with my own eyes. Yes, all of them, including gay men getting “shot down” only to reply to the other girl beside them “what? but she does! she has really nice tits!”
Also, people are inherrently contradictory. Its really amusing watching people claim strangers they don’t know, and fictional characters no less, are more consistent than that.
If she shot him a nasty look, I won’t argue that’s unwarrented or inappropriate, but that’s not what’s portrayed.
I’m not reading that or replying to you further. I sent a ten minute video to help you understand, you replied to me in less than a minute. You want to remain an incel brained red pill dumb ass that’s on you loser.
Wait, you think I’m ALSO not complaining about the author setting up pure rage-bait with the least context possible in order to leave interpretation open to the broadest available set of people who will get upset and pontificate at eachother?
… but at the same time, the audience has seen hundreds of these. How the fuck are y’all not bored of ignoring all but the most self-serving narrative by now?
Lastly, bitches do be that way - I don’t even have a problem with it. Y’all want to applaud both the girl (possibly)trying to make another girl jealous, and the girl getting jealous, but villainize any man who exists in their space with enough spatial-awareness to notice their efforts.
THAT DUDE COULD BE GAY OR SINGLE, notice the one lady’s style, upset her by not giving a specific performative response or keeping his ugly eyes elsewhere, and the girl he’s walking with would still give him shit both for using his eyes as she herself almost certainly has for what evolution put them there for, and for not backing her take that “that thirsty bitch needs to put on more clothes”.
People are allowed to be thirsty. Policing eachother’s gaze is no more laudable than trying to control the competition’s attire, and all fall short next to either the guy or the girl having the sincerity to shout “You go girl!!” The worst barely-concealed thirst offers versus all that is discretion and a lack of effort.
I understand your confusion because I’m talking about both what the comic is depicting, and what REAL WOMEN in THE REAL WORLD have the freedom to say and do.
…but if you think the comics creator is trying to depict a gay man checking out someone’s style whilst the person next to them is expressing jealousy. Then I think you need your eyes checked.
That is NOT what the comic is about… And even if it were you’re skipping the fact that the conversation is about how media depictions (so yes, we are discussing the media) contains messages that effect women in the real world.
Also, policing and thinking about people’s gaze is part of social communication. Sarte writes about this in Being and Nothingness. If you watch this video you’ll see it’s about solitude and self, you too by feeling your natural gaze is being “policed” are ALSO experiencing “The Gaze” or “The Look”…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5r-qoABSF9E
So you’re reacting to that policing which you feel “seen” by. You are probably a male (as I am), we both, I suspect, like looking at tits. I’m not trying to invalidate that process, the policing isn’t intended to stop that, it’s intended to get certain messages and social boundaries around that “corrected”.
… BECAUSE this comic, is a type of misinformation, where women are naturally contradictory, rather than their behavior being a construction and imposition of outside gender rules …which media like this, is propaganda to reinforce.
I think I’ve seen the things I’ve described happen with my own eyes. Yes, all of them, including gay men getting “shot down” only to reply to the other girl beside them “what? but she does! she has really nice tits!”
Also, people are inherrently contradictory. Its really amusing watching people claim strangers they don’t know, and fictional characters no less, are more consistent than that.
If she shot him a nasty look, I won’t argue that’s unwarrented or inappropriate, but that’s not what’s portrayed.
I’m not reading that or replying to you further. I sent a ten minute video to help you understand, you replied to me in less than a minute. You want to remain an incel brained red pill dumb ass that’s on you loser.