• Ilixtze@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    10 days ago

    Does this imply that if trump had said that Nato was great, then the Europeans would had hepled him with his illegal invasion and genocide of the people of Iran?

    • Rothe@piefed.socialEnglish
      0·
      9 days ago

      No, it does not. It is called a strawman, one of the favourite “arguments” of tankies alongside whataboutism.

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        9 days ago

        As an olive branch: I wish you guys don’t stop winning; whoever you are.

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        10 days ago

        And if he had said nato was awesome then this ongoing genocide would be justified? The past killings make the current killings good? And how many people will have to die until the imperialists pigs are satisfied?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      10 days ago

      The fuck is wrong with you? It’s making fun of him for deriding something and then immediately being angry that NATO, the useless thing we don’t need, didn’t help.

      You’re fishing for drama by missing the point of “trump is a buffoon”.

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        9 days ago

        I’m just asking a question; If the buffoon had propped up nato and then decided to bomb little girls in Iran; Would that be acceptable or inacceptable? Also does that question make you feel uncomfortable?

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      0·
      9 days ago

      I’m curious: as an imbecile, do you generally find the world to be a confusing and frightening place?

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        9 days ago

        Maybe you are the one who finds me confusing and frightening, that is the reason you need to call me an imbecile ;) But you haven’t answered my question; Is genocide acceptable by an orange man that is an “ally”?