baatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 2 months agoGoogle Photos is losing some of its editing shortcuts to 'reduce accidental triggers'9to5google.comexternal-linkmessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Photos is losing some of its editing shortcuts to 'reduce accidental triggers'9to5google.combaatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYes, I know that. I just don’t understand the purpose of this single word comment in a post about ux enhancements in Google photos.
minus-squaredabster291@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey were name-dropping a competitor to Google photos, implying the competitor is the solution to the issue/enshittification presented in the article (although I don’t know if anyone who doesn’t already know about it will recognise the name).
minus-squaredefinitemaybe@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThe last sentence is kinda core to why parent poster’s comment isn’t really helpful. But here we are talking about it, so more evidence that engagement hacking works, I guess?
Yes, I know that. I just don’t understand the purpose of this single word comment in a post about ux enhancements in Google photos.
They were name-dropping a competitor to Google photos, implying the competitor is the solution to the issue/enshittification presented in the article (although I don’t know if anyone who doesn’t already know about it will recognise the name).
The last sentence is kinda core to why parent poster’s comment isn’t really helpful.
But here we are talking about it, so more evidence that engagement hacking works, I guess?