• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Crossing the floor seems to me to be anti-democratic. At the same time, taking a stance that you believe in, even if it goes against your fellow voters, seems honourable. Everything is shades of grey.

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t have a problem with floor crossing if it’s being done by an MP in the interest of best serving the will and priorities of their constituents as an elected representative. That said, if they ran on one platform and now are going to be loyal to another, I’m okay with them having to get a renewed mandate from their constituents. Floor crossing itself can be part of the democratic process. Getting a renewed mandate also seems to strengthen the democratic process.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Technically (and as intended originally), you vote for a representative. What they choose after that, including party affiliations, is up to them.

      In practice, nobody uses the system as it’s designed.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Which means we should change it. Just vote and decide the seats. Everyone thinks they are voting for the PM anyways.